It's possible to trade profitably on the Forex, the nearly $2 trillion worldwide currency exchange market. But the odds are against you, even more so if you don't prepare and plan your trades. According to a 2014 Bloomberg report, several analyses of retail Forex trading, including one by the National Futures Association (NFA), the industry's regulatory body, concluded that more than two out of three Forex traders lose money. This suggests that self-education and caution are recommended. Here are some approaches that may improve your odds of taking a profit. Prepare Before You Begin Trading Because the Forex market is highly leveraged -- as much as 50 to 1 -- it can have the same appeal as buying a lottery ticket: some small chance of making a killing. This, however, isn't trading; it's gambling, with the odds long against you. A better way of entering the Forex market is to carefully prepare. Beginning with a practice account is helpful and risk-free. While you're trading in your practice account, read the most frequently recommended Forex trading books, among them Currency Forecasting: A Guide to Fundamental and Technical Models of Exchange Rate Determination, by Michael R. Rosenberg is short, not too sweet and highly admired introduction to the Forex market. Forex Strategies: Best Forex Strategies for High Profits and Reduced Risk, by Matthew Maybury is an excellent introduction to Forex trading. The Little Book of Currency Trading: How to Make Big Profits in the World of Forex, by Kathy Lien is another concise introduction that has stood the test of time. All three are available on Amazon. Rosenberg's book, unfortunately, is pricey, but it's widely available in public libraries. "Trading in the Zone: Master the Market with Confidence, Discipline and a Winning Attitude," by Mark Douglas is another good book that's available on Amazon, and, again, somewhat pricey, although the Kindle edition is not. Use the information gained from your reading to plan your trades before plunging in. The more you change your plan, the more you end up in trouble and the less likely that elusive forex profit will end up in your pocket. Diversify and Limit Your Risks Two strategies that belong in every trader's arsenal are: Diversification: Traders who execute many small traders, particularly in different markets where the correlation between markets is low, have a better chance of making a profit. Putting all your money in one big trade is always a bad idea. Familiarize yourself with ways guaranteeing a profit on an already profitable order, such as a trailing stop, and of limiting losses using stop and limit orders. These strategies and more are covered in the recommended books. Novice traders often make the mistake of concentrating on how to win; it's even more important to understand how to limit your losses. Be Patient Forex traders, particularly beginners, are prone to getting nervous if a trade does not go their way immediately, or if the trade goes into a little profit they get itchy to pull the plug and walk away with a small profit that could have been a significant profit with little downside risk using appropriate risk reduction strategies. In "On Any Given Sunday," Al Pacino reminds us that "football is a game of inches." That's a winning attitude in the Forex market as well. Remember that you are going to win some trades and lose others. Take satisfaction in the accumulation of a few more wins than losses. Over time, that could make you rich!

TAGS

#IPKat (51) patents (20) copyright (19) trade marks (15) Rose Hughes (9) Eleonora Rosati (8) events (7) #NeverTooLate (5) trade mark (5) AmeriKat (4) CJEU (4) Miscellany (4) Nedim Malovic (4) Peter Ling (4) epo (4) #copyright infringement (3) Artificial Intelligence (3) Board of Appeal (3) Brexit (3) EU (3) FRAND (3) Freedom of expression (3) Image rights (3) Parody (3) Singapore (3) burden of proof (3) geographical indications (3) job opportunities (3) likelihood of confusion (3) scotch whisky (3) upc (3) #AroundtheIPBlogs (2) #copyright (2) 2019 Patent Year in Review (2) AI (2) Boards of Appeal (2) Book review (2) Chijioke Okorie (2) China IP. (2) DABUS (2) EU Trade Mark Regulation 2017/1001 (2) IP (2) IP News (2) IP conferences (2) IPEC (2) Italy (2) John Marshall Law School (2) Riana Harvey (2) Survey evidence (2) T 1299/15 (2) Teva (2) UKIPO (2) acquired distinctiveness (2) anti-suit injunction (2) bad faith (2) calls for papers (2) conceptual similarity (2) conference report (2) confidential information (2) confidentiality (2) defamation (2) fashion law (2) geographic indications (2) hate speech (2) news (2) nigeria (2) novelty (2) originality (2) priority (2) unitary patent court agreement (2) unitary patents court (2) "robot judge" (1) #Brexit (1) #EPO (1) #IPKat events (1) #USPTO (1) #trade marks (1) - #AroundtheIPBlogs (1) .eu reserved names (1) 2019 Copyright Awards (1) 3.2.08 (1) 3.3.01 (1) 3G (1) : ecj reference (1) AG Opinion (1) AI hype (1) AI inventor (1) AI works (1) Academy of European Law (1) Actavis v Boehringer (1) Airbnb (1) Amsterdam (1) Andrea Rossi (1) Article 7 EUTMR (1) Article 7(1)(e)(iii) EUTMR (1) Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR (1) Article 87 EPC (1) Association for Accessible Medicines (1) Australia (1) BA case law (1) Balema (1) Batmobile (1) Beijing Internet Court (1) Board of Appeal 3.2.01 (1) Board of Appeal 3.2.05 (1) Bohdan Widła (1) Bombardier (1) Borsellino (1) Bruce Lee (1) C-143/19 P (1) C-263/18; copyright (1) C-301/15 Soulier and Doke (1) C-367/15 (1) CRISPR (1) Catherine Sidonio (1) Chicago (1) Chien (1) China (1) China IP. blockchain. (1) Civil procedure (1) Cofemel (1) Combination Sign (1) Community plant varieties rights (1) Community plant variety office (1) Competitions (1) Coty Germany v Amazon C-567/18 (1) Court of Appeal (1) Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (1) Cremers (1) Cutty Sark (1) D.C. Fontana (1) Dev Gangjee (1) Dolce&Gabbana (1) EBA (1) EU General Court (1) EUIPO (1) EUTMR (1) Economics (1) Enforcement Directive (1) Enlarged Board of Appeal (1) European patent (1) Fakes (1) Falcone (1) Fashion (1) Fashion Law London (1) Formalities Manual (1) G 1/19 (1) G 2/19 (1) G 3/19 (1) GI (1) Gabrielle Coco Chanel (1) Gabrielle trademark (1) Gene Roddenberry (1) Germany (1) Glen (1) Global assessment of likelihood of confusion (1) Google reviews (1) Greece (1) Guest post (1) Harvard (1) Henkel (1) Herbay v Hungary (1) INTA economic impact study (1) IP Book of the Year (1) IP Education Series (1) IP and pharma (1) IP policy (1) IPCom (1) IPEdSeries (1) IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2019 (1) Ilanah Fhima (1) Ilaria Gargiulo (1) InfoSoc Directive (1) Infopaq (1) Injunction (1) International Copyright Law (1) Internet court (1) Jean-Francois Bauret (1) Jeff Koons (1) Kan He (1) Kylie Minogue (1) Leeds (1) Leonard Nimoy (1) Levola Hengelo (1) Libertel (1) Lilly v HGS (1) Lord Justice Arnold (1) Maradona (1) Modena (1) Monday miscellany (1) Mr. Spock (1) NHS (1) New Year's Eve (1) Nivea (1) Novartis (1) OLG Karlsruhe (1) Odysseus and Ithaca (1) PTAB (1) Parasitic copying (1) Patent Infrigement (1) Patent amendment (1) Patent invalidity (1) PhD applications (1) Poland (1) Polk Wagner (1) Primart (1) Recast EU Trade Mark DIrective (1) Rental and Lending Rights Directive (1) Robert Burns (1) SEP (1) SEPs (1) SPC (1) SPC regulation (1) SSOs (1) Schweppes (1) Section 101 (1) Shamnad Basheer (1) Sieckmann criteria (1) Siemens (1) Small claims track (1) Spain (1) Spedidam v INA C-484/18 (1) Star trek (1) Stephen Thaler (1) Stim and SAMI C-753/18 (1) Switzerland (1) TCL v Ericsson (1) TIPSY mark (1) Tam o'Shanter poem (1) Teva v Gilead (1) Texas A&M University School of Law (1) The first AI inventor (1) Tosshan (1) Trade mark use (1) Turin Court of First Instance (1) UK politics (1) US IP law (1) US IP legislation (1) US/UK trade negotiations (1) USPTO (1) University of Surrey (1) WIPO (1) WIPO internship (1) Weed (1) Whisky (1) Zischka (1) absolute grounds for invalidity (1) absolute grounds for refusal (1) access to justice (1) aceto (1) ai patents (1) algocracy (1) amazon (1) anti-anti-suit injunction (1) antitrust (1) antonella gentile (1) article 3(a) (1) artwork (1) assessment of damages (1) author principle (1) balsemico (1) birmingham (1) blockchain (1) book reviews (1) breach of confidence (1) bristol (1) cannabis (1) cardiff (1) claim limitation (1) claim scope (1) co-applicants (1) collective trade marks (1) communication to the public (1) competition law (1) compulsory licensing (1) computer simulated inventions (1) concept of works (1) conservatives (1) copyright and freedom of expression (1) counterclaim for invalidity (1) crown use (1) cryptoassets (1) cryptocurrency (1) damages (1) danish market court (1) data exclusivity (1) digital exhaustion; InfoSoc Directive; e-books; Software Directive; EU copyright; CJEU; Tom Kabinet (1) direct liability (1) discrimination (1) distinctive character (1) distinctiveness (1) double patenting (1) eSports (1) economic links (1) economics and IP (1) employees (1) epc (1) event reports (1) evocation (1) exhaustion (1) fake review (1) fashion style name (1) fictional character (1) final implementation in France (1) france (1) free speech (1) general election (1) genuine use (1) grace period (1) honest concurrent use (1) hotels (1) human authorship (1) ibil (1) implied license (1) in memoriam (1) injunctions (1) insufficiency (1) intangible property (1) interactive entertainment (1) international jurisdiction (1) invalid priority (1) inventor (1) inventorship (1) joint applicants (1) lenovo (1) likelihood of deception (1) listings (1) lord justice floyd (1) love actually (1) machine learning (1) mandatory medation (1) mandatory mediation (1) market for rhinoceros horns as a medicine (1) medeva (1) misleading indication (1) misuse of confidential information (1) money (1) more than just a game (1) motorola (1) mr justice birss (1) name (1) new law (1) newcastle (1) non-traditional marks (1) notional and fair use (1) online marketplaces (1) online piracy (1) open access (1) open innovation (1) opposition (1) overconsumption of alcohol (1) ownership (1) painting (1) patent (1) patent eligibility (1) patent injunctions (1) patent litigation (1) patent quality (1) patent term extension (1) patenting AI (1) pepper (1) performers (1) philosophy (1) plant varieties (1) plant variety rights (1) platforms (1) pop culture (1) property (1) proportionality (1) proving a negative (1) public consultation (1) public policy (1) punitive damages (1) referral to EBA (1) regulation 110/2008 (1) regulatory approval (1) request withdrawn (1) rolls building (1) rule of law (1) safe harbours (1) shapes (1) shapes which give substantial value (1) smart contracts (1) split trademark ownership (1) stay of enforcement (1) stocking (1) substantial value (1) take down notice procedure (1) tartan (1) tea ship (1) technical shape (1) textiles (1) three-dimensional trade mark (1) tic tac (1) trade agreement (1) trade mark specification (1) trademark license (1) trademark opposition (1) trademarks (1) transitional provisions of TMA 1994 (1) ucl (1) ucpa (1) unitary patent (1) updates (1) use of name (1) videogames (1) visual similarities (1) webinars (1) wines and spirits (1) work (1) writing competitions (1) “The Confusion Test in European Trade Mark Law” (1)